Immerse yourself in the atmosphere of the Venice Biennale with my short video! Click here to watch it.
Immerse yourself in the atmosphere of the Venice Biennale with my short video! Click here to watch it.
I had visited Tate Modern many times. On entering the turbine hall I always got excited at the art I was about to discover. So when I found out that they were recruiting volunteers, I couldn’t wait to apply! At the time I was working in an office Monday to Friday in Reading, but I really wanted to get a job in the art world. I thought that this opportunity would help me achieve my goal or at least quench my thirst for art and culture which my office job was lacking.
I was invited to attend an interview with two Volunteer Program Assistants. They were looking for volunteers to fill the role of Visitor Hosts. The job description was to “enhance the visitor’s experience of the gallery” which included: providing directions, information, promoting activities and obtaining feedback from the visitors. Volunteers were expected to work three shifts a month, each shift lasting only two hours for a minimum of six months. The interviewers informed me that they had received hundreds of applications for the roles.
I was successful and attended an induction day with the other new recruits. We spent half a day going through what was expected of us, our role, Tate’s programs, emergency procedure and Tate’s principles. We were told that we should take ownership of the place, and treat it as if it were our gallery. On another day, volunteers were taken on a tour of the gallery by a curator who talked us through the collections on display.
When meeting my fellow volunteers I was surprised at the different mix of people. You had art students, retired people, housewives, professionals in high flying jobs, and the unemployed. Their reasons for volunteering also varied from meeting like-minded people, to gaining free access to galleries across London, to locals wanting to feel part of the community.
As a Visitor Host, I spent the majority of my time just standing in the gallery, with an aluminous orange sash, bag and badge on me posing the question to the visitor “Can I help you?” Unsurprisingly the most common question I answered was “Where is the nearest toilet?” I always had a sinking feeling that some know-it-all would come up to me and start an art debate about “What is art?” or somewhat and I would be exposed as a fraud, someone who did not really know what much about art at all.
I worked there for just under a year (June 2009-May 2010). Tate paid expenses up to £14.80 a day, which was very generous as we only worked two hours a day. A great benefit of volunteering was that you gained access to all the exhibitions across the Tate sites which would normally cost between £10-12. You also gained access to major galleries across London. I was lucky enough to see the J.W.Waterhouse: The Modern Pre-Raphaelite exhibition at the Royal Academy, the Walking in My Mind at the Haywood Gallery, all for flashing my Tate pass as I went inside.
I always felt that we were treated as valued members of staff. We got invited to private viewings of new exhibitions, curator’s talks about the pieces, and even a Christmas party with a talk from Nicholas Serota thanking us for our hard work.
It is through working at Tate I discovered the course BA (Hons) History of Art and Museums Studies at Liverpool John Moores University, which is in partnership with Tate Liverpool. I have just completed my first year and I am very grateful that my volunteer experience gave me the courage to apply to University and the confidence that this was the career path for me.
When I think dancing I think lack of inhibition, a fair share of agility and a positive body image. A fairly bland association, I know. The current exhibition at the Courtauld, however, changed all that.
Toulouse-Lautrec and Jane Avril: Beyond the Moulin Rouge is the first time the pictorial and personal relationship between one of Moulin Rouge’s most famous dancers and the artist has been explored. A series of preparatory drawings, posters, photographs, medical records and other items divided into two rooms all aim to throw light on this unlikely pairing. It’s not just that Avril came from a poor background while Toulouse-Lautrec – from an affluent one. If that wasn’t enough one suffered a debilitating series of accidents that led to deformity while the other earned a living flaunting her agile legs.
Very soon I felt for Jane Avril. It wasn’t because she had an alcoholic mother who used to beat her or because after she ran away from home and was hospitalised. It was because of how little there was of her.
‘Jane Avril’ was Jeanne Beaudon’s stage name, adopted after a suggestion by her British lover. Although the exhibition organisers wanted to draw on the private/public dichotomy, I never felt I was looking at Jane Avril independent of the Moulin Rouge. There was a reference in one of the texts to her memoires but these were not physically included here. Instead, one famous man’s pictorial representation of Jane Avril dominated the landscape together with another man’s written account of her.
The latter was Arsène Alexandre whose newspaper article was the first source of contemporary information in this exhibition. Quotes from it were translated and reproduced on the wall. The historian in me is always a bit mistrustful of translations (especially partial) and I wanted to see how much of my high school French I could remember. When I read Alexandre’s description of Jane Avril who ‘walks pensively along the streets, meditating on the age-old stupidy of men’ I immediately knew something didn’t sound right. To credit a can-can dancer (but above all a female) with such strong philosophical abilities would have been extremely untypical in French nineteenth-century writing unless followed by a qualification, obliterating the previous statement. Sure enough, when I read the whole phrase in French in turned out that the pensive Jane also likes to meditate on ‘the beautiful arrangement of a new outfit’ which in French, somehow, manages to sound even more condescending. In some ways, I wasn’t surprised the curator had decided to omit that. However, cherry picking of quotes to create a certain impression is always a dangerous activity and here it was carried out on more than one occasion.
Another piece of information was not explored in its full potential – namely, the fact that while in hospital, Avril was diagnosed with a nervous disorder known as St Vitus’s dance (this is associated with uncontrollable leg movements and was also linked to female hysteria). This episode was cunningly used by Avril herself to add to the mystery surrounding her image and she succeeded in making herself even more interesting to a nineteenth-century crowd. Looking at the medical records, I wished this exhibition were organised by the Wellcome Collection who would have had the knowledge and resources to build an exhibition around it instead of leaving it hanging in the air. At the Courtauld, much like in nineteenth-century Paris – this fact was used to add to the enigma rather than to de-mystify. Shame, given how great the Courtauld normally are at helping to bring new information to light.
Saying anything bad about the Courtauld is almost sacrilege to me and although I must be excommunicated by now, I must say I expected more. Lured by the promise of the exhibition taking me ‘Beyond the Moulin Rouge’ I was somewhat disappointed when the tour ended a block away from the nightclub.
The only thing that salvaged the exhibition was an image I felt had almost slipped in by accident. Tucked in the corner of room 2 was a theatre programme designed by none other than Edward Munch. With a single image, the mood was transformed and the meaning of everything I had seen before shifted. Go see it!

Edvard Munch (1863-1944) Peer Gynt 1896 Lithograph 25.2 x 31.8 cm Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris
For full information on tickets and opening times, go to http://www.courtauld.ac.uk/gallery/exhibitions/2011/Lautrec.shtml
Private Vs Public Galleries
There is one question that seems to raise a lot of fears among students and that is Private vs Public galleries. Here we go back again to the question of why are you doing an internship. If it is to get a job at the place you are interning, then a private (small) gallery might be the better place because the people you are directly working for and with will have a say in hiring you. In a private gallery you have to be prepared to do things like making tea and coffee but it’s also likely, due to the limited number of staff they have, that you’ll be entrusted with more and more responsibilities as they get to know you. This will be great for building your CV.
In a public gallery your role will have been clearly defined by HR and even if you are eager you will not be entrusted to do more than what it says in the internship description. As far as jobs are concerned – you should not expect to get a job in the same department or in the organization as a whole. On the plus side, having a big name on your CV will mean a lot even if you apply for jobs outside the arts sector.
If you are fearful about making the transition from private to public sphere, I want to put your minds at ease. As the public (arts) sector becomes increasingly commercial, any experience gained within the private sector will only be a plus. On the other hand, experience gained in the public sector can mean a lot in the context of a new/small commercial gallery as far as contacts and know-how are concerned.
Where to start
The best place to start is making sure you have an excellent CV (brief, effective, easy to read and up-to-the point) and cover letter. Although this is an obvious point, it is crucial that you have done this. I recently had a look at a covering letter I had written a while back. No sooner had I started reading than my cheeks started burning. While I was clearly enthusiastic and well-informed about the gallery I was applying to, I had shown a complete disregard for the traditional cover letter layout. Fresh out of university, what I had written resembled more an essay than a letter and, needless to say, my enthusiasm and relevant knowledge were not sufficient to tip the scales in my favour. A useful thing to do is ask a colleague or a friend to send you a copy of the covering letter and CV that got them in. Similarly, your university is likely to have a Careers Service where you will find a number of good brochures and leaflets instead of buying books which will essentially teach you the same. A great online source of information is www.prospects.ac.uk, as well as University of Leicester Museums Jobs Desk – http://www.le.ac.uk/ms/jobs/job_titles_jobid.htm. The latter is normally updated every Friday and lists a variety of position within the arts. However, not all positions which are currently available are listed there so:
1. Check each gallery/company’s own website – some galleries have ongoing internship opportunities and they don’t bother listing them externally. A case in point is Lisson Gallery and Black Dog Publishing
2. Sign up with a temping agency – You would be surprised that some galleries enlist the help of recruitment agencies to find an Intern. I know I certainly was when after I had signed up with a temping agency (looking for paid work) I got a call offering me an internship at the Serpentine Gallery (a position which was not advertised on their website)
3. Ask your tutor – Smaller galleries especially are very likely to send emails to university tutors. This is how I got my first internship.
4. Email and ask them anyway – Smaller museums especially sometimes don’t list internship/volunteering opportunities but most likely than not they will need some extra help
5. Find out what is going on in your university – Do they have a paintings/drawings/artifact collection? Are they planning a show of students’ work? Are they looking for someone to write art reviews in the student newspaper? Ask to get involved.
6. Look up local charities – regardless of whether a charity deals with helping domestic violence victims, refugees or helping disabled people they are very likely to have an arts programme and be eager to find help
7. Create your own project – Is there something that you are good at/curious about that you can turn into your own project? For example, when I was in the height of looking for a job I organized a Careers event at my university – paradoxical, I know, but I learned a lot in the process.
8. Ask your colleagues and friends– Maybe some of your colleagues are involved or have heard of someone else being involved with a great project? You would be surprised how small the arts world is. Your colleagues are your best source of advice and you should refer to the ones among them you trust frequently.
9. Spread the word – Social networking gives you a great opportunity to announce something quickly to a large number of people. Why not announce you are looking for an internship?
10. Finally I need to warn you about an unfortunate by-product of looking for an internship: disappointment and discouragement. You will inevitably find places that are looking for something more than you can offer. (I recently came across an internship ad at one of London’s most famous galleries that listed French and Japanese among their selection criteria.) The best thing is to find activities which boost your confidence – meeting friends who praise and encourage you, reviewing your past achievements and doing things you are already good at. Having tunnel vision might help sometimes but when it comes to job/internship hunting it’s best to remain aware of the bigger picture.
With tuition fees and uncertainty in Higher Education on the rise, there is an even greater emphasis on improving students’ employment prospects. Some degrees – like Law or Finance – have always been orientated towards the future job market. Others – like History of Art – continue to be largely divorced from the reality of the uncertain arts job market. As any art history student knows internships are supposed to be the tried and tested way of getting a job. Is that the case today or have internships become obsolete as this youtube video suggests?
Instead of relying on the many myths about internships, I want to share the practical knowledge I gained in the process of doing three internships. Where to look for internships, how to get them, what to expect and beware of as well as some broader observations will all help you decide whether an internship is the best way to get you the job you want.
Consider this…
Most internships in the arts in England are unpaid (many don’t even cover basic expenses) while the time commitment they require is anywhere between 1-5 days a week for a period of 3-6 months. I know that for most people an internship is a means to an end – be it getting work experience to build up your CV or getting a job. So, I will first look at what you can get out of your internship and how it can be useful for you before I look at the practical matter of where to look for internships.
Let me start by separating a few other forms of unpaid labour. There is volunteering, work placements and internships. Traditionally, work placements are aimed at people aged 16-19 and gives them some exposure to work life. Volunteering is something you can do at any point in your life and can commit as little or as much of your time as you want. An internship on the other hand is a mixed ‘breed’. Internships in the arts are usually aimed at recent graduates or PhD students, can be carried out over a long period of time – up to a year. For most internships you already need to have some work experience and knowledge in a subject.
An internship – from what previous generations of graduates have told me – used to be a great way to get your foot in the door. The formula was ‘make yourself indispensible and at the end of it, they will offer you a job’. I am sorry to report that this is no longer true in the majority of cases. Currently, there are far too many candidates competing for a limited number of places. I once applied (and got) an internship for which 90 other candidates had applied. Some institutions have been quick to realize this fact and have increased the number of internships they offer. That sadly does not mean an increased number of ways to get your foot in the door: it just means that these bodies have increased their capacity to use unpaid labor. Whether or not you get a job at the end of an internship depends more than anything else on the type of organization (who has a say in hiring people), its structure (what entry level positions – if any – there are) and its recruitment policy.
This is not to say you shouldn’t be a diligent and hard-working intern (although I doubt anyone who has gone through the arduous process of getting an internship will allow themselves to kick back and relax). I am also not suggesting you should forget about internships. On the contrary. Internships can be a great way to get experience and – even more importantly – learn a lot about how a gallery/museum operates. And lastly, one of the most invaluable things an internship can offer you is the opportunity to work with, observe and learn from people who have accomplished a lot and can be your role models. Unlike a mentor, a role model can be anyone in your surroundings – even if they are not aware of it. I think this is what makes an internship different, and better, than any other work experience. During meetings with senior-level staff an intern can observe and learn a lot about communication styles, ways you can influence and motivate employees. I think this is extremely important when you bear in mind your longer-term career goals. Such meetings and interactions can help you decide where you want to go with your career. Although they might not have an immediate result, being in close proximity to successful people, is the most lasting benefit of doing an internship.
If it doesn’t help you get your foot in the door then why should I do an internship at all? I hope you are asking yourself this question – this can save you a lot of time, money and frustration. Knowing the time commitment most internships demand, I cannot urge anyone to do an internship.
As an intern you would be expected to commit to anything between 1 to 5 days a week for a period of 3 to 6 months! (Lisson Gallery, for example, expect an intern to work 5 days a week for a period of 6 months).
And yes, you guessed it, you won’t be paid unless you are interning at Christie’s which is the only organization (in London) which offers paid internships.
end of part 1
Sofia, the capital of Bulgaria, is better known for its ski-resorts and cheap alcohol than for its great art galleries. Yet if you have been busy skiing and drinking (hopefully not at the same time), you might have missed out on one of the best art galleries you can ever hope to visit: The National Gallery of Foreign Art in Sofia.
Situated in the heart of Sofia, it’s in close proximity to all cultural landmarks: the church Alexander Nevski, Sofia University, the Parliament and the early medieval temple (and my personal favourite) Hagia Sophia.
Location is not its only asset, however. It also houses a great collection of world art. Buddhist, Japanese, Indian and African art co-exist happily with Russian, French, Spanish, Dutch and Italian art. The time span is equally broad – 5th century BC to mid-twentieth century. Hokusai, Delacroix, Renoir, Signac and Matisse all make the 6 leva entry fee (2.67 pounds) sound like a great deal. And luckily for anyone who doesn’t speak Bulgarian, there are plenty of labels and panels with explanatory notes to help you make sense of what you are seeing.
One of the things which struck me (especially so after my trip to Italy) was the fact that in the whole building, apart from me and the invigilators, there were three other visitors! The exhibition rooms are spacious and filled with artworks worthy of your attention. But to be able to enjoy them without any interruption was a unique experience.
And speaking of worth, there were three artworks which stood out for me during this visit. The first – by Henrih Semiradski was the portrait of a woman un-prettified by make up or artistic choice. The noticeable moustache above her upper lip, the joint eyebrows and crooked nosed only served to enhance her dark beauty. Pensive and concentrated, she is the sole occupant of her world. Next to her, a typically pretty face – Alfred Seifert’s Head of a Girl – emphasised the strength of Semiradsky’s work.
My next favourite is a work I always come back to – Roland Oudot’s Huts at Well in Lacques. The scenery always reminds of a desolate Bulgarian landscape. The golden frame offsets the ashy greys, and its ornaments make for an even starker contrast with the reality it depicts. Such unlikely pairings bring to mind many absurdities Bulgarian are used to and if you are lucky you might spot either: flashy modern cars next to horse-driven carts on the highway is just one of the ways in which old and new coexist in Bulgaria.
The third work, which made an impression on me, is part of their current temporary exhibition ‘Paper’. It was a work by American artist Barbara Edelstein entitled Wind. Dream part 4. Aided by subdued lighting and soothing music playing in the background, the work was almost transcendental.
So next time you are in this part of Eastern Europe go have a look at the Gallery of Foreign Art, you are bound to add new favourites to your own list.
This year’s Biennale reached an unprecedented 89 participating countries. The title of the exhibition curated by Bice Curiger is ILLUMInations – a clever pun on one hand referring to art’s ability to enrich one’s life as well as an affirmation of the national principle on which the Biennale is based. As well as national Pavilions the Biennale features an exhibition by the appointed curator in the Central Pavilion. This reflects the curator’s take on what and who is important at the moment. Curiger – an art historian as well as a critic and curator – wanted to emphasise connections between the art of the past and that of the present. That is why she has included three pieces by none other than Venice’s own Tintoretto. Tintoretto – known for his use of light and going against tradition – captures the essence of her vision.
The national pavilions are concentrated in the Giardini as well as in various locations throughout the lagoon. This has always raised questions of exclusion and it is not difficult to see why. While the States, the UK, France, Spain, Russia and Japan are all in the Giardini, Bulgaria’s participating artists – Houben Tcherkelov, Greddy Assa and Pavel Koychev – are relegated to the beautiful but remote Palazzo Carmini.
As soon as I entered the exhibition space, my heart sank. What I was seeing would have been appropriate for an out-of-the way gallery in Bulgaria selling local art to tourists. To say that it wasn’t appropriate for a Biennale would be an understatement. The Bulgarian artworks made even the pavilions I didn’t think much of look like the best of contemporary art. Why? Because they looked insignificant, uninteresting. It was immediately apparent that a couple of months are not sufficient to prepare for any biennale, much less the Venice one.
A purple cow, several coloured miniature houses made from cardboard and wood and some photographs bearing the name of the photo centre which printed them is what 3 generations of Bulgarian artists have produced. Or that’s at least the view of curator (and brand management provider) Georges Luks.
No wonder back in Bulgaria art critics, curators, art historians and museum professionals were up in arms. Had the Ministry of Culture asked them, something actually contemporary could have come out of our participation. It might have taken me 40 minutes to get from Giardini to Carmini, but the Bulgarian participation was light years behind from what was happening at Biennale.
Until recently the topic of contemporary Bulgarian art was rarely discussed on a national level. This changed, however, after a newsworthy mixture of money, politics and lack of transparency in ministerial decisions around Bulgaria’s participation at the Venice Biennale, got everyone talking. To make more sense of what’s been happening, I went to speak to the person who found themselves in the eye of the storm – Chief Curator at Sofia Art Gallery – Dr Maria Vassileva.
When the Ministry of Culture announced that Bulgaria would not be participating at the Biennale, the Bulgarian art community and general public were shocked and disappointed. This reaction was reflected well in an article published on The Art Newspaper’s website, entitled Bulgaria misses out on the Venice Biennale—again, dated February 21. The author, Richard Unwin, had spoken to one of the key figures in the Bulgarian art community – Dr Maria Vassileva, who openly voiced her dissatisfaction with the lack of governmental support for contemporary art.
According to the now well-accepted story, which raises many questions with its fairy-tale-like chain of events, after reading the article in The Art Newspaper, two organisations teamed up together to correct the Ministry’s poor decision. One was Gershon Bulgaria, a media consulting agency, and the other – the America Foundation for Bulgaria, a not-for-profit organisation which aims to promote Bulgarian achievements in the educational and cultural spheres. They approached the Bulgarian Ministry, having already selected three artists – Pavel Koichev, Huben Cherkelov and Gredi Assa, and offered to support their participation. The Ministry accepted. Such bypassing outraged many a Bulgarian art professional, as Maria Vassileva tells me, as ‘no Bulgarian art professionals – curators, art historians or critics – were consulted [for this selection]’. This ‘only demonstrates the lack of respect for our professions and the complete disregard for our expertise’, allowing private interests to influence major decisions which involve cultural politics. Not only were they not consulted, they were not even informed of this choice and learned about it from the Biennale’s website on 21st March.
The dates are crucial here as it would appear that under a month, two organisations who don’t specialise in art were able to find a curator, decide on the theme and artists, and organise all logistics. This has raised suspicions that this feat was in fact dictated by financial interests and possibly orchestrated months in advance. Sources in Bulgaria have quickly pointed to the source of this sudden interest might be as all three artists are represented by one and the same gallery, none other than the Museum Gallery of Modern Art. Since its opening a few years ago, the MGMA has been attracting a lot of attention thanks to a strong exhibition programme, an even stronger advertising campaign.
The internal scandal aside, the important question now is how will Bulgaria fare at the Biennale’s international platform? Luckily, I am about to find out on June 1st.
Hello,
I wanted to say thank you to everyone who has subscribed to my blog. I do hope you enjoy what is already posted and here is a sneak peak into what’s coming up in the next few weeks!
Sarah Thornton’s Seven days in the Art World has undoubtedly been one of the best books on contemporary art – and everything else which goes with it – that I have read recently. If you haven’t – it’s without a doubt worth buying. Inspired by her, I decided to do my own version of it: Seven Days in the Bulgarian Art World. So there will be seven articles on different aspects on what I have seen during my time here. Bulgaria is certainly not on the international art radar. Or so I thought. My recent talks with curators, artists and visitors here have exposed me to an art scene as vibrant – and as you will see as scandalous – as that of any big city. The Scandal will be the first of this series of articles and has to do with a choice of three artists for the Venice Biennale which shook not only the art scene but made art front page news. You will find out why.
Speaking of the Biennale – this is where I will be on June 1 when it opens for press. I have never been to an event of such magnitude and I am as excited as can be! There will be posts, photos and I also plan to do a video. A picture is worth a thousand words and a video – ten thousand?
If there is anything you think I should include – or while in Venice keep an eye out for – do let me know and I will do my best to cover it!
Have a great Bank Holiday weekend!
Petya
by Zainab Djavanroodi
Walking through Coral Reef, currently on display at Tate Britain, you can’t help but ask yourself what is going on? Is this a stage set? A drug den? A reception room? All or none of these assumptions could be true, everything a part of the enigma that unravels throughout the installation.
Created in 2000 for Matt’s Gallery, Coral Reef earned Nelson one of his two Turner Prize nominations and has since become regarded as a modern masterpiece. Somewhere between an architect and a sculptor, Nelson creates myriad installations, straddling and blurring the line between fact and fiction. His working practice often involves spending a certain amount of time in the place where the installation is to be exhibited, allowing Nelson to include specific cultural references, for example disparate objects associated with the place.
Coral Reef is undoubtedly a very powerful piece of work. All immersive, claustrophobic and seedy, it demonstrates a meticulous accumulation of detail. A small, unassuming door in room 28 of Tate Britain leads the visitor on a journey through various rooms and corridors. The best time to visit is when no other people are there (between 10 and 11am) – nothing but squeaky doors and the echo of your own footsteps. Many of the passageways and entrances look the same, in part to incite moments of panic when the viewer they might not find their way out. In Tate Britain the sensation of entering an entirely different world is doubly enhanced; moving through the main foyer and the high ceilings of the galleries into the confined spaces and small hallways of Nelson’s installation makes for an interesting juxtaposition of space.
The power of the installation ultimately lies in the feelings it evokes. The apparent shabbiness and rough aesthetic it emanates is misleading; everything is very carefully controlled, specifically chosen and purposely placed in order to freak out and unnerve. Paradoxically, what is actually being seen (in terms of physical items and what they could mean) is very much left open to interpretation; viewers are free to invent their own narratives and stories about the occupant/s of these rooms, perhaps due to the scarcity of objects and the ambiguity that this creates. Like the many misleading corridors and doors, Nelson leaves clues and connotations making interpretation and meaning elusive and ambiguous.
Nelson is this year’s selection for Great Britain at the Venice Biennale. It will be interesting to see how Nelson’s work will fair at the British Pavilion at the Biennale. He is a fascinating choice – the first installation artist to be shown at the British Pavilion; a solo presentation that will be demanding not only on the viewer but also on the Pavilion. His work is a real break from the past for the British Pavilion, and from more traditional presentations such as Steve McQueen’s film work of 2009 and Gilbert and George’s wall mounted pictures of 2005. Nelson will no doubt be constructing a labyrinth installation, creeping out the art tourists looking for something sensational at Venice.
Coral Reef is currently on display at Tate Britain. Entry is free